Evaluation

Your work has been completed.  Now is the time to evaluate your work.  Your publication will be graded using the following rubrics.
 

Novice

1

Apprentice

2

Veteran

3

Master

4

Score


Content

 

 No subject knowledge is evident Information is missing.  No comments.

Fulfills minimal requirements. Some subject knowledge is evident, however it is confusing.  hardly any original input.

Includes essential information.  Subject knowledge is evident in most of the publication.  Original comments and/or stories.

Covers topic in depth and very detailed.  Excellent use of resources.  Interesting comments and stories.
  


Mechanics

 

Publication has 5 or more misspellings and grammatical errors.  Poor design and minimal use of graphics.

Publication has 4 misspellings or grammatical errors.  Layout is not very clear.  Some graphics used.

Publication has 3 or fewer misspellings or grammatical errors, and interesting layout and graphics.

Publication has no misspellings or grammatical errors, is pleasing to the eye and uses adequate amount of visual enhances
  

Originality

 

Work is minimal.  No effort to make publication interesting to the reader

Publication uses only templates.  No original ideas.

Publication shows some original thought.  Work shows new insights.  Interesting design and use of visual art.

Publication shows a large amount of original thought.  Ideas are creative and excellent use of graphics and visual art.
  


Teamwork

 

The workload was not divided equally and only one or two people did the work.

The workload amounts varied between a few members.

Most team members contributed their fare share of the work.

The workload was divided and shared equally by all the team members.